596 So. 2d 358 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brewster v. Derwinski · Cage v. Louisiana · Jones v. Howard · Bottoson v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no prejudice and severance is not required if the facts of each offense are not complex, and there is little likelihood that the jury will be confused by the evidence of more than one crime.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson · State v. Sam“If it appears that a defendant or the state is prejudiced by a joinder of offenses in an indictment or bill of information or by such joinder for trial together, the court may order separate trials, grant a severance of offenses, or provide whatever other relief justice requires.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.