Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

596 So. 2d 534

M.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-04-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1995

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-04-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We agree with the defendant that the circumstantial evidence presented by the state on the grand theft count failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence and will not support the conviction. However, the record supports the defendant’s conviction for dealing in stolen property.

¶2AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

GOSHORN, C.J., and COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/596/so2d/534 · .json · Public domain