596 So. 2d 665 - Pardo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 160 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 190 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably McMahan v. Toto (2002), 850 So. 2d 452 - Brannon v. State (2003)
9 federal appellate · 160 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 450 So. 2d 217 - Holly v. Auld · Van Pelt v. Hilliard · 554 So. 2d 1165 - Pisano v. State · 333 So. 2d 51 - State v. Hayes · Stanfill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 190 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n the absence of interdistrict conflict, district court decisions bind all Florida trial courts.”
29 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is a fundamental principle of statutory construction that where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous there is no occasion for judicial interpretation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bradford · M.G. v. State“if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.