596 So. 2d 73 - Judge v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
131 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State (2000), 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino (1998)
131 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State · 448 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Rhoden · 564 So. 2d 480 - Cresswell v. State · 595 So. 2d 22 - State v. Barnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 3.800(a) is intended to provide relief for a narrow category of cases in which the sentence imposes a penalty that is simply not authorized by law. It is concerned primarily with whether the terms and conditions of the punishment for a particular offense are permissible as a matter of law. It is not a vehicle designed to re-examine whether the procedure employed to impose the punishment comported with statutory law and due process.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Hernandez v. State · Dean v. State“[A] habitual offender sentence is illegal for purposes of rule 3.800(a) only if: (1) the terms or conditions of the sentence exceed those authorized by section 775.084 for the adjudicated offense, or (2) a prior offense essential to categorize the defendant as a habitual offender does not actually exist.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Bover v. State · Bover v. State“which is correctable only after an evidentiary hearing under rule 3.850; and (3) an”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.