596 So. 2d 744 - Pyle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Gissendanner v. State · 548 So. 2d 812 - Rowland v. State · 575 So. 2d 1335 - Ford v. State · 586 So. 2d 490 - McCollun v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he inclusion of special conditions of probation in a written order that were not orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing mandates a reversal and remand for correction of the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Christobal v. State“to consider those appeals in which the appellants pled nolo contendere, and whose written probation orders include special conditions of probation that were not orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Christobal v. State“a defendant can maintain a direct appeal, even when a plea of nolo contendere or guilty is entered, if the defendant raises issues which occur at the time the plea is entered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.