Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

596 So. 2d 769

Macon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-04-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2005

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-04-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HARRIS, Judge.

¶1Gary L. Macon appeals his sentence entered after he pled to a multi-count information. He contends that the court failed to follow the plea agreement by not ordering the minimum mandatory terms for two counts to run concurrent. However, since the judge did not order the sentences to run consecutive, section 921.16(1), Fla.Stat. (1991) requires that they run concurrent.

¶2AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DIAMANTIS, J., concur.
/596/so2d/769 · .json · Public domain