Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

596 So. 2d 774

Henderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-04-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1993

1 state decisions

Relies on 552 So. 2d 1107 - State v. Betancourt · 520 So. 2d 1 - Robinson v. State · 584 So. 2d 209 - Brown v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-04-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The sentence imposed against the appellant is a departure sentence, Robinson v. State, 520 So.2d 1 (Fla.1988), but no reasons for departure were given. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Because the sentencing transcript reveals that the trial judge did not know that he was imposing a departure sentence, on remand he may consider a departure sentence. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989). The trial court is directed to give the appellant credit for all time served as of the date of resen-*775tencing. See Brown v. State, 584 So.2d 209 (Fla.1991).

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
/596/so2d/774 · .json · Public domain