Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

596 So. 2d 80

Wray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 22, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-01-22

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1994

2 state decisions

Relies on 515 So. 2d 227 - Phillips v. Dugger · 506 So. 2d 1068 - Brown v. State · Moore v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-01-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HALL, Acting Chief Judge.

¶1We find merit only in Wray’s argument that the trial court improperly imposed court costs as a condition of probation without citing proper statutory authority. Brown v. State, 506 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), review denied, 515 So.2d 229 (Fla.1987); Moore v. State, 525 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we remand with directions that the imposition of court costs be stricken without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition with citation of proper statutory authority.

¶2Affirmed and remanded.

THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
/596/so2d/80 · .json · Public domain