Walls v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2014
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 572 So. 2d 1368 - Larson v. State · 508 So. 2d 758 - Kord v. State · 578 So. 2d 457 - Boudreaux v. State · 527 So. 2d 305 - Hackworth v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court’s requirement that [the defendant] maintain full-time employment is sufficiently egregious to be the equivalent of fundamental error. Factors beyond [the defendant’s control, for example, the poor economy, may prevent him from satisfying that element of his probation. As such, the trial court erred in placing the full-time employment requirement on [the defendant]. The court should have instead ordered [the defendant] to maintain or actively seek gainful employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he court should have ... ordered Walls to maintain or actively seek gainful employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“sufficiently egregious to be the equivalent of fundamental error,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.