596 So. 2d 991 - Happ v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2018
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Oregon v. Kennedy · McNeil v. Wisconsin · Michigan v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A shoe print found outside the driver's side of the car was later found to match one of Happ's shoes.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] friend of Happ's testified that he had seen Happ walking down U.S. Highway 19 toward the barge canal at 11 p.m. on May 23....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Happ v. Moore“Happ's former girlfriend testified that Happ had told her that he broke a car window with his fist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Happ v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.