State Ex Rel. Anglin v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Riggs v. Burson (1997), State v. Pritchett (1981)
2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gideon v. Wainwright · Gault · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Argersinger v. Hamlin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. the juveniles in Anglin did not have a de novo right of appeal; 2. the juveniles’ sentences went into immediate effect; 3. the juveniles faced felony charges carrying “loss of liberty for from seven to eight years”; and 4. the juveniles had five days in which to perfect an appeal as opposed to thirty days.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent““(N)othing in the holding of this Court precludes a nonlawyer judge from making a pre-trial inquiry designed to determine whether there is a substantial likelihood that a hearing, if conducted, would result in an adjudication of delinquency and confinement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Voltz““We cannot countenance and classify as constitutional any procedure whereby it is necessary that a citizen stand two trials in order to get one fair trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. York
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.