Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 596 SW2D 79 - Dick v. Shannon

Dick v. Shannon’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · State Ex Rel. Emcasco Insurance Co. v. Rush · Gibson v. Sharp · Stenzel v. State, Department of Revenue · Wolf v. Miravalle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An “interest” which compels joinder does not include a mere consequential, remote or conjectural possibility of being in some manner affected by the result of the original action. It must be such a direct claim upon the subject matter of the action that the joined party will either gain or lose by direct operation of the judgment to be rendered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.