Shoop v. Twyford’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Wainwright v. Sykes · Johnson v. Jones · Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · Price v. Johnston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“should stay that way and never be allowed to swallow the general rule that a party is entitled to a single appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Belya v. Kapral“to provide for an appeal of an interlocutory decision to the courts of appeals that is not otherwise provided for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Belya v. Kapral“defin[ing] when a ruling of a district court is final for the purposes of appeal under [ 28 U.S.C. § 1291 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Belya v. Kapral
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.