Eichman v. Indiana State University Board of Trustees’s Empirical Analysis
597 F.2d 1104 · 1979
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Egger v. Phillips (1983), Malhotra v. Cotter & Co. (1989)
25 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Perry v. Sindermann · Griswold v. State of Connecticut
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Title VII does not require that as a prerequisite to suit an individual alleging discrimination must first file a complaint. Instead, the statutory language speaks of a charge filed by or on behalf of a person claiming to be aggrieved (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(b)) (emphasis added) and states that a civil action may be brought by the person aggrieved (§ 2000e-5(f)(l)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As this court has explicitly held, there can be no claim of a denial of due process, either substantive or procedural, absent deprivation of either a liberty or property right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Webster v. Redmond“the plaintiff had not alleged that he was a member of a racial minority”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.