Certified Corporation v. Hawaii Teamsters and Allied Workers Local Ibt’s Empirical Analysis
597 F.2d 1269 · 1979
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Haberman Construction Co. (1981), Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary/Bartender Trust Fund v. Las Vegas Sands, Inc. (2001)
28 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vaca v. Sipes · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston · Ohio v. Kentucky · Evans v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is settled that in the absence of a statute preventing oral modification of a contract, a written contract can Always be orally modified, even if its express terms prohibit modification except in writing. 'Two contractors cannot by mutual agreement limit their power to control their legal relations by future mutual agreement.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“effectuates the federal policy of maintaining 'industrial peace.' It encourages resolution of labor disputes by negotiation rather than by the economic pressure of a strike.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“consideration is not necessary to make a collective bargaining agreement enforceable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.