Lambert v. Park’s Empirical Analysis
597 F.2d 236 · 1979
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2015
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 8 Cal. 3d 229 - Cobbs v. Grant · Schloendorff v. Society of the New York Hospital · Sard v. Hardy · 58 Wis. 2d 569 - Trogun v. Fruchtman · Wilson v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]very human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent, commits an assault for which he is liable in damages. This is true, except in cases of emergency where the patient is unconscious, and where it is necessary to operate before consent can be obtained. Id. at 129-30 , 105 N.E. at 93 . (Citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Woolley v. Henderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.