United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. v. J. Henry Schroder Bank & Trust Co.’s Empirical Analysis
597 F.2d 348 · 1979
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2007 · most notably Trustees of Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. McFarlin's, Inc. (1986), In Re Chateaugay Corp. (1989)
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Lane v. Haytian Corp. · Lane v. Haytian Corp. of America · In Re FAS International, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled that the bankruptcy court lacks the power to grant, and the policy of the Bankruptcy Act is against compensation [and reimbursement of expenses] not expressly provided for by the Act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.