Cooper v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
597 F.2d 628 · 1979
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Martin (1984), 25 Cal. 4th 610 - People v. Lewis (2001)
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Irvin v. Dowd · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Murphy v. Florida · Crist v. Bretz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Claimed errors in instructions to the jury are generally not of such constitutional magnitude and do not state a claim for habeas corpus relief. * * * More particularly the courts have held that the trial court’s failure to give a lesser included offense instruction is not normally such a constitutional error or “fundamen tal defect” as to allow collateral review under habeas corpus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nerison v. Solem“no evidence that the delay in swearing the jury prejudiced petitioner's right to a jury trial, fair trial or due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.