In re McNulty’s Empirical Analysis
597 F.3d 344 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3771
Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Hughey v. United States · Cheney v. United States District Court for District of Columbia · United States v. Johnson · Gall v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requires that the harm to the victim be closely related to the conduct inherent to the offense, rather than merely tangentially linked.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e find our case law construing the VWPA ... persuasive, both for how the CVRA is to be interpreted procedurally and for when an individual qualifies as a victim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.