In re Howard’s Empirical Analysis
597 F.3d 852 · 2010
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Butner v. United States · Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash · Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. · In re Wright · Graupner v. Nuvell Credit Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t's a consumer-protection statute, intended to require disclosure of the charges that make up the total price that a consumer pays for the car, rather than to prescribe what is and is not included in the purchase money security interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Penrod“The `value given' part of the definition is intended to make clear that the obligation can be to a finance company ... rather than to the seller.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Penrod“value given to enable the debtor to acquire rights in or the use of collateral”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Penrod
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.