Younis v. Farooqi’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 102 · 26 U.S.C. § 71 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1183A (§ 213a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Football Club, Inc. · Drewitt v. Pratt · Dennis v. Columbia Colleton Medical Center, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]romise to provide any and all financial support necessary to assist the sponsor [plaintiff-husband] in maintaining the sponsored immigrant(s) at or above [125 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines] during the period in which the affidavit of support is enforceable[,]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ssuming the plaintiff ha[d] an obligation to mitigate her damages by seeking employment, she need not apply for every available job in order to mitigate her losses; she need only make reasonable efforts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To determine the appropriate [support due from the sponsor], courts compare the [sponsored immigrant's] annual income for the particular years at issue ... against the 125% poverty threshold for each particular year.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnett v. Barnett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.