Wagerman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Keihn · Hoffman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) the legislative history, title or context of a criminal statute; 2) similar or related statutes; 3) the severity of punishment (greater penalties favor culpable mental state requirement); 4) the danger to the public of prohibited conduct (greater danger disfavors need for culpable mental state requirement); 5) the defendant's opportunity to ascertain the ° operative facts and avoid the prohibited conduct; 6) the prosecutor's difficulty in proving the defendant's mental state; and 7) the number of expected prosecutions (greater numbers suggest that crime does not require culpable mental state).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Walker v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.