Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

597 So. 2d 340

Gawron v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-04-08

Relies on 584 So. 2d 599 - Siplin v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-04-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2017

16 state decisions

90199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HALL, Acting Chief Judge.

¶1We find merit only in Gawron’s argument that he was improperly ordered to pay $100 to the Hillsborough County Court Improvement Fund without being afforded adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard. Siplin v. State, 584 So.2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

¶2Accordingly, we strike the $100 without prejudice to the state to seek to reimpose this cost after giving Gawron proper notice and an opportunity to be heard.

¶3Gawron’s judgments and sentences are affirmed, but the $100 cost is stricken.

PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/597/so2d/340 · .json · Public domain