Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 597 So. 2d 627 - Lott v. State

597 So. 2d 627 - Lott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably 943 So. 2d 20 - Hannah v. State (2006), 725 So. 2d 764 - Templeton v. State (1998)

36 state decisions

220199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · McCarthy v. United States · United States v. Dayton · 521 So. 2d 914 - Reynolds v. State · 560 So. 2d 148 - Schmitt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sufficiently specific to allow the court to determine that the defendant's conduct was within the ambit of that defined as criminal.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]efore entering judgment on a guilty plea, ... [to] determine that there is a factual basis for the plea.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “There is nothing in the record to suggest that Lott was offered any hopes of reward for entering his plea of guilty, or that he was coerced, threatened or intimidated into making it. To the contrary, the circuit court interrogated Lott thoroughly and carefully explained to him the full gamut of constitutional protections available to him as well as the ramifications of entering a guilty plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.