Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 597 So. 2d 782 - Gorham v. State

597 So. 2d 782 - Gorham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2016

18 state decisions

110199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Watson v. Louisiana · Florida Bar Re Amendment to Article XI, Florida Bar Integration Rule (Rules of Discipline)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the Government possessed evidence favorable to the defendant (including impeachment evidence); (2) that the defendant does not possess the evidence nor could he obtain it himself with any reasonable diligence; (3) that the prosecution suppressed the favorable evidence; and (4) that had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “constructive knowledge and possession of evidence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A `reasonable probability' is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.