Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

597 So. 2d 976

Dean v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-05-13

Relies on Jackson v. State

Decided 1992-05-13

SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge,

¶1dissenting.

¶2In my judgment, the interests of justice require that a jury hear the newly discovered evidence of a person who admits committing the crime of which the appellant stands convicted. I therefore believe the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for new trial. See Jackson v. State, 416 So.2d 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

/597/so2d/976 · .json · Public domain