¶1REVERSED. We agree with the state that the circuit court erred in holding as a matter of law that the appellee’s speedy trial rights were violated. See State v. Brown, 527 So.2d 209 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 534 So.2d 398 (Fla.1988); Birken v. Scheer, 543 So.2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 553 So.2d 1166 (Fla.1989); State v. Counce, 392 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
597 So. 2d 986
State v. Lowther
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 27, 1992
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-05-27
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1994
1 state decisions
Relies on 534 So. 2d 393 - State v. Pennington · Stringfellow v. Stringfellow · 527 So. 2d 209 - State v. Brown
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1992-05-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →