Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 597 SW2D 373 - Holcomb v. State

Holcomb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1996
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 150 Tex. Crim. 137 - Harris v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the instrument or writing is in the hands or power of the adverse party, there are, in general, except in the cases above mentioned, no means at law of compelling him to produce it; but the practice in such cases is to give him or his attorney a regular notice to produce the original. Not that, on proof of such notice, he is compellable to give evidence against himself, but to lay a foundation for the introduction of secondary evidence of the contents of the document or writing, by showing that the party has done all in his power to produce the original.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the defendant ... is given notice to produce the original of said writing upon the trial of this indictment or secondary evidence will be resorted to prove its contents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.