Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 597 SW2D 665 - Brame v. State

Brame v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1988
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on M. Morrin & Son Co. v. Burgess Construction Co. · Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden · Seales v. State · Crosswhite v. State · Thomas v. Wyrick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By the very nature of a criminal trial, a lawyer’s function is a continuing judgmental process. Choices are constantly presented for one alternative action or another, often in a shifting factual situation with little or no time for reflective thought before decision is required. * * Factors which influence those practical judgments are often subtle and not apparent on a cold record. * * * Likewise, in the setting of a criminal trial, the alternatives may be all bad.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.