United States v. D'Angelo’s Empirical Analysis
598 F.2d 1002 · 1979
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Carson v. Polley (1982), Washington v. Strickland (1982)
42 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Dunn v. United States · Mattox v. United States · Williams v. Florida · United States v. Dotterweich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the effect of anything upon his or another juror's mind or emotions as influencing him to assent or dissent from the verdict or concerning his mental processes in connection therewith.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An attempt to use information extrinsic from the jury’s verdict to ‘prove its process of deliberation and find out how and why the jury reached its verdict ... is the one form of attack on a verdict that has always been forbidden in Anglo-American criminal law.’”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is a peculiar facet of the jury institution that once a verdict is rendered, no judicial inquiry is permitted into the jury's deliberative process to determine if in fact the court's instructions were properly followed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.