Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

598 F.2d 344

Docket No. 78-5181.

United States v. Herbert

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued March 9, 1979.

Decided May 24, 1979.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1979-05-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1979

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 242

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1979-05-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1J. Troy Smith, Jr., New Bern, N. C. (Ward & Smith, P. A., New Bern, N. C., on brief), for appellant.

¶2*345Cynthia L. Attwood, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C. (George M. Anderson, U. S. Atty., Raleigh, N. C., Drew S. Days, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Walter W. Barnett, Linda K. Davis and Bruce J. Berger, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.

¶3Before BUTZNER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5The defendant/appellant, an officer in the Havelock, North Carolina police department, was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 242 (1970) of depriving an individual of his liberty without due process of law. He received a six month sentence and a $1,000 fine. The defendant asserts on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of “willfulness” on his part, as is required by the statute. After careful review of the record, we are convinced that substantial evidence exists to support the jury’s finding of willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt. There being no other error alleged or apparent, the judgment of the district court is

¶6AFFIRMED.

/598/f2d/344 · .json · Public domain