Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 F.3d 938 - Quigley v. Winter

Quigley v. Winter’s Empirical Analysis

598 F.3d 938 · 2010

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
2
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3612 (§ 812 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3613 (§ 813 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3614 (§ 814 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3617 (§ 818 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · Smith v. Wade · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Campbell · Blanchard v. Bergeron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[plaintiff] testified [defendant] subjected her to unwanted touching on two occasions, made sexually suggestive comments, rubbed his genitals in front of her, placed several middle of the night phone calls to her home, [and] made repeated unannounced visits”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A district court enjoys wide discretion in ruling on the admissibility of proffered evidence, and evidentiary rulings should only be overturned if there was a clear and prejudicial abuse of discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Plain error is a stringently limited standard of review, especially in the civil context. (internal quotation marks omitted)); SEC v. DiBella, 587 F.3d 553 , 569 (2d Cir.2009) (noting that the standard of review in the civil context”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.