Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

598 F. App'x 195

Schaeffer v. Adex Corp.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 20, 2015

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2015-03-20

Decided 2015-03-20

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Todd Schaeffer appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim, denying his motion for judgment, and denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schaeffer v. ADEX Corp., No. 1:14-cv-01127-TSE-TCB (E.D.Va. Nov. 25, 2014; Dec. 19, 2014; Dec. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/598/fappx/195 · .json · Public domain