Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 FSUPP2D 45 - Smith v. Cafe Asia

Smith v. Cafe Asia’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

23 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Foman v. Davis · Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp. · James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the Currency · Atchinson v. District of Columbia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, acceptable as true, to “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” ... A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.