598 N.E.2d
Volume 598 — North Eastern Reporter, Second Series
43 opinions
- 598 N.E.2d 510Gallagher v. Indiana State Election Board (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 516Evans v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 519Brooks v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 520Nicks v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 525Dolliver v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 532Arvin North American Automotive v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training Services (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 540Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Schafer (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 558Nelson v. Denkins (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 564Becker v. Plemmons (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 570John v. Marion County Department of Public Welfare (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 570Matter of ACB (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 574Capps v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 580INB Banking Co. v. Opportunity Options, Inc. (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 586Roe v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 589King v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 594Van Scoik v. Kosciusko County Board of Zoning Appeals (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 596Zelek v. Jankowski (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 597Ricketts v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 603Indiana DLandowner's request for floodway construction permit was denied by the Natural Resources Commission (NRC), and landowner sought judicial review. The Marion Superior Court, James S. Kirsch, J., vacated NRC's order. NRC appealed. The Court of Appeals, Ratliff, C.J., held that: (1) landowner had burden of proving that no harm would come to fish, wildlife or botanical resources through its proposed construction (2) property was "floodway" within meaning of Indiana Flood Control Act and (8) landowner was not denied fundamental due process.epartment of Natural Resources v. United Refuse Co. (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 608Indiana Department of Public Welfare v. Payne (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 610Weyls v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 616Prenatt v. Stevens (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 623Barton v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 625City of Gary v. Allstate Insurance Co. (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 630Hawn v. Padgett (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 634City of Portage v. Harrington (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 639Harris v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 640First National Leasing v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 647Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1041Davis v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1054Adoptive Parents of M.L v. v. Wilkens (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1060Richter v. State (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1065Smith v. Syd's, Inc. (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1067Keane v. Pachter (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1074Detrick v. Midwest Pipe & Steel, Inc. (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1081State v. Burroff (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1084Kroger Food Stores, Inc. v. Clark (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1099Babinchak v. Town of Chesterton (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1103Dale Bland Trucking, Inc. v. Kiger (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1106Jackson v. Paris (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1108Rebel v. National City Bank of Evansville (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1111Chambers Ex Rel. Hamm v. Ludlow (1992)
- 598 N.E.2d 1119Misztal v. State (1992)