Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 P2D 1346 - Seal v. Mapleton City

Seal v. Mapleton City’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2003

8 state decisions

501979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 1 Utah 2d 244 - Davis v. Provo City Corp. · Mower v. McCARTHY · State Ex Rel. Veach v. Veach · Finn v. Rees · 25 Utah 2d 351 - Farrell v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, where no request has been made for findings of fact, the presumption is that the trial court found all facts necessary to support its order and judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.