Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 P2D 262 - Fetter v. State

Fetter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2024

7 state decisions

30197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pearson v. State · Fox v. State · Campbell v. State · Dooley v. State · Wright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Existence of a conspiracy need not be established by direct evidence, but proof of circumstances from which existence of a conspiracy may fairly be inferred is sufficient.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]o constitute the crime of conspiracy in Oklahoma, two essential elements are required: an agreement between two or more people to commit an unlawful act, and some overt act by one or more of the parties in furtherance of this agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.