Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 SE2D 369 - In Re Rh

In Re Rh’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 254 Ga. App. 330 - In Re Tn · In the Interest of J. A. F. · In the Interest of R. H. · In the Interest of E. G. W. · 262 Ga. App. 722 - In Re JAF

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In considering the sufficiency of the evidence supporting a juvenile court adjudication of delinquency, this Court applies the same standard of review that is used in any criminal case. That is, we construe the evidence in favor of the juvenile court's findings to determine if a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the juvenile committed the act charged. The resolution of conflicts in the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses falls within the province of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.