In Re Mtc’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 259 Ga. App. 680 - In Re RAR · In the Interest of M. T. C. · In the Interest of A. D. L. · 253 Ga. App. 64 - In Re Adl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appellant must show harm as well as error to prevail on appeal; error to be reversible must be harmful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Dw
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.