Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

598 So. 2d 1003

Wilson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1992-05-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2003

2 state decisions

Relies on 598 So. 2d 1000 - Wilson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-05-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMillan, judge.

¶2We remanded this cause to the trial court for sentencing in compliance with § 13A-12-231(2)(a), Code of Alabama 1975, 598 So.2d 1000. The trial court has filed its return, which states the following:

“It is the judgment and sentence of the Court that the defendant, in addition to the sentence already pronounced and included therein, shall be fined $50,000 as required by statute.”

¶3The mandatory fine having been imposed, the judgment of the trial court is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

¶4AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.
/598/so2d/1003 · .json · Public domain