Mather v. Northcutt’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 593 So. 2d 500 - McCain v. Florida Power Corporation · Navajo Circle, Inc. v. Development Concepts Corp. · 348 So. 2d 363 - Sapp v. City of Tallahassee · Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters · 406 So. 2d 72 - Ankers v. DISTRICT SCH. BD. OF PASCO
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To state a cause of action in negligence, a complaint must allege ultimate facts which establish a relationship between the parties giving rise to a legal duty in the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury of which he now complains.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.