Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 So. 2d 1063 - Smith v. State

598 So. 2d 1063 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

152
cited by 152 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 147 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 152 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State (2000), Davis v. State (1995)

1 federal appellate · 147 state decisions

840199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Stovall v. Denno · Griffith v. Kentucky · Linkletter v. Walker · Miller v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 152 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all cases pending on direct review or not yet final.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “applied retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final, with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a `clear break' with the past.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Although we have occasionally applied precedent retrospectively on collateral review, we have in numerous instances distinguished collateral cases from `pipeline' cases, i.e., those not yet final at the time the law changed, applying the change in law retrospectively only to the pipeline cases.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.