598 So. 2d 121 - Thames v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope · 493 So. 2d 447 - Barnett Bank v. Estate of Read · In Re Estate of Parson · PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST DADE CTY. v. Estate of Jara · 584 So. 2d 964 - In Re Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“difference between the two is that a statute of limitations bars untimely claims only when a party asserts the operation of the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense; a statute of nonclaim operates as an automatic bar to untimely claims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.