¶1The judgment of the trial court is due to be affirmed. See Holland v. NeSmith, 593 So.2d 82 (Ala.1992), and Harper v. Smith, 582 So.2d 1089 (Ala.1991).
¶2AFFIRMED.
598 So. 2d 1389
Decided May 22, 1992
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1992-05-22
Relies on 582 So. 2d 1089 - Harper v. Smith · 593 So. 2d 82 - Holland v. NeSmith
Decided 1992-05-22
¶1The judgment of the trial court is due to be affirmed. See Holland v. NeSmith, 593 So.2d 82 (Ala.1992), and Harper v. Smith, 582 So.2d 1089 (Ala.1991).
¶2AFFIRMED.