Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 So. 2d 14 - Marshall v. State

598 So. 2d 14 - Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably 621 So. 2d 309 - Clark v. State (1993), Pressley v. State (1999)

25 state decisions

100199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Arizona v. Youngblood · Houltin v. United States · Porzig v. Nolden · Cherek v. United States · New York Stock Exchange v. Legate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`Ultimately, the test to be applied is whether the juror can set aside [his] opinions and try the case fairly and impartially, according to the law and the evidence. This determination again is to be based on the juror's answers and demeanor and is within the discretion of the trial judge. Thus, a prospective juror should not be disqualified for prejudices or biases if it appears from his or her answers and demeanor that the influence of those prejudices and biases can be eliminated and a verdict rendered according to the evidence.'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “whether a juror can set aside their opinions and try the case fairly and impartially, according to the law and the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We note that a close relationship between a veniremember and a victim may give rise to an impression of possible bias.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.