Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

598 So. 2d 332

Bennett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-06-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1993

1 state decisions

Relies on Allied Corp. v. District 17, United Mine Workers · 465 So. 2d 516 - Cruz v. State · State v. Munoz

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-06-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SHIVERS, Judge.

¶1We affirm on the basis of State v. Munoz, 586 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), review granted, Case No. 78,900 (Fla. April 30, 1992), and Simmons v. State, 590 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), which was authored by Judge Wolf. We again certify the following question as one of great public importance:

HAS THE OBJECTIVE ENTRAPMENT TEST SET FORTH IN CRUZ V STATE, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.1985), cert, denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105, S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed. 2d 652 (1985), BEEN ABOLISHED BY THE ENACTMENT OF SECTION 777.201, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987)?
MINER, J., concurs.WOLF, J., specially concurs, with opinion.
/598/so2d/332 · .json · Public domain