Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

598 So. 2d 338

In re Nabonne

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 27, 1992

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1992-05-27

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2004

12 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-05-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

¶2We have reviewed the Disciplinary Board’s findings of fact, its application of the Rules of Professional Conduct to those facts, its recommended discipline, and Disciplinary Counsel’s objection to the Disciplinary Board ruling. Upon review of the record filed herein, the objection and brief filed by Disciplinary Counsel, and oral argument, it is the decision of this Court to adopt the recommended discipline of a sixty (60) day suspension, except, for clarity and certainty of term, the suspension be effec-*339tivé from the date of finality of this judgment.

¶3DECREE

¶4ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT RONALD P. NABONNE BE SUSPENDED FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW FOR A PERIOD OF SIXTY DAYS FROM THE FINALITY OF THIS JUDGMENT.

¶5ALL COSTS OF THIS PROCEEDING ARE ASSESSED TO THE RESPONDENT. SIXTY DAY SUSPENSION ORDERED.

/598/so2d/338 · .json · Public domain