Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 So. 2d 493 - State v. Wright

598 So. 2d 493 - State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
4
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2016

23 state decisions

110199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By definition, the essential elements of attempted possession of a firearm are also essential elements of the greater offense charged. Thus, the evidence which supports a conviction of possession of a firearm necessarily supports a conviction of the lesser offense of attempt. The jury in fact chose to return a responsive verdict of count two, attempted illegal possession of a stolen thing, though the evidence clearly would have supported a conviction of the completed offense. There is a reasonable probability that the jury would have returned the responsive verdict of attempt on count one, if the proper instruction had been given. Considering the seriousness of the error as evidenced by the foregoing jurisprudence, defendant has established ineffective assistance of counsel under the Strickland standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining whether the failure to give a responsive verdict of attempt is reversible error, the question is whether there is a reasonable probability that, had the jury been given the responsive verdict of attempt, the verdict would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.