Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 SW2D 204 - Chambers v. Bunker

Chambers v. Bunker’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Susan E. Morrow, an Incompetent v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., a Corporation, Susan E. Morrow, an Incompetent v. Douglas H. Huber · Dickerson v. St. Louis Public Service Company · Barber v. M. F. A. Milling Co. · Nutz v. Shepherd · Nichols v. Blake

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Your verdict must be for the plaintiff Mary Jines if you believe: First, defendant failed to hospitalize Mary Jines on March 1, 1979 and failed to perform culture and sensitivity studies and X-rays on that date and failed to treat her with large doses of intravenous antibiotics on that date and Second, defendant was thereby negligent, and Third, such negligence directly caused or directly contributed to cause damage to plaintiff Mary Jines.” (Our emphasis.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “become independent and the result cannot be envisioned to be the natural and probable consequence of the primary cause or one which ought to have been anticipated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.