Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 598 SW2D 285 - Dominique v. State

Dominique v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2018

21 state decisions

1601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Denham v. State · Plunkett v. State · Hubbard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) In this code: (11) “Deadly weapon” means: ****** (B) anything that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In Hubbard v. State, 579 S.W.2d 930 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), we held that one must look to the weapon’s use and intended use to determine if it is a deadly weapon. In Denham v. State, 574 S.W.2d 129 (Tex.Cr.App.1978), we held that the nature of the inflicted wounds is a factor to be considered but that wounds are not a necessary prerequisite for an object to be a deadly weapon. * * * The most important criteria was the manner in which the weapon was used.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We hold that holding the sharp object to Fairchild’s neck accompanied by a threat to kill and, later, slashing motions with that instrument is sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that the scissors, in the manner of their intended use, constituted a deadly weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.